Child support Search Engine

Child Support search results

Please Donate

“Child Support” is growing and we need the support of our readers. Because we do not advertise on our site, we must ask our loyal readers to continue supporting us and help us grow. We are in need of your donations 5, 10, 15, 25, 50 or 100 will help us reach our budget goal of $300,000 to manage our year end budget. Child Support has managed to touch over 100,000 thousand satisfied reader, and we continue to enjoy the added comments. Thanks for your continued support Kenneth

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

N.J. Superior Court judge suspended for using lawyer with cases before her

N.J. Attorney General's Office at the Hughes Justice Complex

TRENTON — A state Superior Court judge was suspended for one month without pay today for seeking help with a child support dispute with her ex-husband from a lawyer who had cases before her, according to an order handed down by the state Supreme Court.
Melanie Appleby, a family court judge in Ocean County, violated six ethics rules for state judges, including one that requires judges to disqualify themselves from proceedings in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
In 2012, Appleby sought help from Frank Louis, a lawyer with two cases before her at the time, to respond to a letter from her ex-husband seeking to terminate child support payments because their son was graduating college, according to a decision issued in September by the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct.
Appleby and Louis met in the judge's chambers to discuss the letter, during which time Louis expressed concern about being disqualified from appearing before her because of a conflict of interest, according to the decision.
"Given these concerns, Mr. Louis offered to 'work something' out whereby he would assist (the judge) with the legal issues" raised by the letter, "while still maintaining his ability to appear before (the judge) on behalf of his other clients," the committee decision said.
Six weeks later, Louis sent a response to Appleby's ex-husband on letterhead of another law firm and with a forged signature, according to the committee. Only after that law firm objected did Louis declare he was representing the judge in the matter.
A complaint was filed with the committee by Appleby's ex-husband accusing her of engaging in a conflict of interest. The committee's finding said she acknowledged as much, but denied attempting to conceal it and denied violating any judicial rules.
The committee, however, disagreed, and the Supreme Court agreed with the findings.
"The evidence demonstrates, clearly and convincingly, that (the judge) failed to conduct herself in a manner consistent with these high ethical standards, and in at least one instance did so intentionally, for which public discipline is necessary," the committee wrote.

3 comments:

Jenny Hayes said...

Hey guys! I love your blog too much. I am waiting for more cool postings to read! Cheers…
Child Support

Child support Orange County said...

This was a remarkable decision by supreme court judge. This decision creates a trust among appellants that their decision will not be parable, but it will be done honestly.

Michael Lechtman said...

Florida law refers to joint custody arrangements as time-sharing: one parent has physical custody of the child while the other is awarded visitation. The purpose of establishing a parenting plan and time-sharing schedule is to serve the best interests of the child by preserving a meaningful relationship with both parents.

Today news is we lost...

Welcome to the info corner...

Have you checked this out?