Child support Search Engine

Child Support search results

Please Donate

“Child Support” is growing and we need the support of our readers. Because we do not advertise on our site, we must ask our loyal readers to continue supporting us and help us grow. We are in need of your donations 5, 10, 15, 25, 50 or 100 will help us reach our budget goal of $300,000 to manage our year end budget. Child Support has managed to touch over 100,000 thousand satisfied reader, and we continue to enjoy the added comments. Thanks for your continued support Kenneth

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Some Mich. dads say paternity law unfair

Daniel Quinn keeps a room in his apartment furnished with toys, dolls and dress-up costumes for his 3-year-old daughter.

But it's unclear whether he'll ever be able to bring her home.

Even though DNA tests, the child's mother and Quinn all agree he's her father, Michigan law says he's not.

That's because the girl was born while the woman was married to another man -- who is still her husband -- meaning Quinn can't demand visitation or even pay child support.

Quinn is among a growing number of men who are challenging Michigan law, claiming that biological fathers should have a stake in the lives of their children.

"I'm a good dad," said Quinn, 32. "Why should I not have rights to my child? Everything I do is for her."

Giving unwed biological fathers rights may only trouble kids, said Jerry Cavellier, adjunct professor of family law at Thomas M. Cooley Law School in Auburn Hills.

"It's in the child's best interest that the husband be viewed as the legal father," Cavellier said.

"How confusing would it be to that child to have two fathers? To change the statute ... would be a disservice to the children."

Candace Beckwith, the mother of Quinn's daughter, says she just wants to keep her family intact.

"She needs to be with her brother and sister," she said. "They're family."

Since the Paternity Act was enacted in 1956, Michigan courts have concluded the purpose of the law was to ensure financial support for illegitimate children rather than allow them to become a financial burden on the public.

If the mother is not married, the biological father is responsible for providing support. If the mother is married, then the husband is responsible for the child, not the biological father. Only in divorce can the husband cede his parental rights to the child.

Across the nation, states define fathers in different ways. But most states refuse to guarantee biological fathers a role in the lives of children born or conceived during another couple's marriage, said Jeanne M. Hannah, a family attorney in Traverse City.

Even though in recent years biological fathers have pushed to change the law, Quinn knows the law is against him. He is awaiting a ruling from the state court of appeals on whether he has paternal standing because he helped raise his daughter during the first 20 months of her life in Grand Blanc. On the other side is the child's mother, who Quinn says he thought would divorce her husband during their courtship. She didn't.

Quinn says his claim has grown more urgent. This month, the child's mother and her husband, Candace and Adam Beckwith, have been charged with drug trafficking and child endangerment in Kentucky, where they now reside with their other two children.

After Adam Beckwith was arrested in Ohio in July, the children were removed by Ohio courts. In family court proceedings that followed in Kentucky and Ohio, the courts did not recognize Quinn. The children have been placed in the temporary care of Adam's parents.

"I think it's a complete injustice to my daughter," Quinn said.

"I want her back in Daddy's arms. I want her safe."

In an interview on a recent visit to Detroit, Candace Beckwith said that her husband is the only father her daughter recognizes. About the felony charges, she said in a later phone interview: "At this point they're just charges. It doesn't mean we're guilty of any of it."

Bill Numerick Jr. hasn't met his biological son, who is now 6 years old.

The 30-year-old from Traverse City said he conceived the boy with his girlfriend in 2002. By the time he was born, the couple had separated, and the mother married another man.

A Grand Traverse County court concluded in 2003 that since the mother was married at the time of the baby's birth, Numerick had no legal claim. On appeal, Numerick lost.

"There was literally nothing I could have done to guarantee my rights," Numerick said.

His court case, however, caught the attention of lawmakers. One in particular, state Sen. Michelle McManus, eventually introduced a bill that would amend the Paternity Act, allowing a biological father to bring legal claim until his child turns 1 year old.

Other conditions, too, would need to be met, like submitting to the court a positive DNA test and proof that the mother was legally separated from her husband at conception.

The bill was reintroduced in February and is awaiting further action.

The Family Law Council, a section of the State Bar of Michigan, helped draft the latest version of the bill. But its advisers have cautioned that changes should be slow and steady, one representative said.

"The question is, 'How quickly and how dramatically should the law move in changing the status quo?' " asked Kent Weichmann, legislative chairman for the council.

The current law, he noted, protects against biological fathers deciding, for instance, that once their child is a teenager, it's time to come back into the picture and claim parenting rights.

"For a child, that's a pretty devastating thing," Weichmann said. "Part of our concern is as the child grows up, they ought to be able to rely on at least who their parents are."

For this reason, Numerick has stopped trying to see his son. He still mails him presents on his birthday and for Christmas. But recently he stopped including his name.

"I always knew I wasn't going to see him at a certain point," Numerick said. "I don't think it would be appropriate for me to barge in right now. It's such a hard situation."

Man arrested for kicking his wife over child support argument

FORT WALTON BEACH -- A man was arrested Nov. 12 after biting, slapping and kicking his wife during an argument over child support.

The 29-year-old man pushed his wife to the ground and began to "bite, slap and kick" her against her will, according to the Okaloosa County Sheriff's Office arrest report.

Evidence included bite marks on her hand and leg, the deputy noted.

He was charged with battery.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Justice for all

They called this justice when the Court sent me a court date that I never receive and imposed $700 dollars a month in child support payment. I will never forget the first time that I received a rude awakening from the child support Court. It is funny that if a man does not show up to Court that he automatically elected not to come to Court... Although if a woman does not show up to court she did not receive the paper work and they must refile that court date. That is the crap that men face when they stand in front of those judges. I suppose my situation is different than many because I had children by two different women in two different states. So imagine my surprise when one judge said that because we filed first, we get the options on taxing your income that is why your paying $700. Then imagine this, that the second child support case says that because the kids were born first that they automatically get first position to take my money and they took $700 dollars. Did I mention that I only maid $1,600 dollars for that pay period and after taxes I made $2.45... How can they be so cold?

I can not imagine if the court system would have thrown the book at me!

Monday, November 23, 2009

Wrongly Convicted Man Sued for Child Support

A man who was pardoned after spending 18 years behind bars for a rape he didn't commit has been sued for child support for the years he was in prison.

Dwayne Allen Dail, 39, was cleared in August of the 1987 rape of a 12-year-old Goldsboro girl. The girl identified him as her attacker, and hair found at the scene was similar to his. DNA evidence found on a fragment of the girl's nightgown years after the trial proved Dail wasn't involved in the attack, however.

Gov. Mike Easley pardoned Dail two weeks ago, making him eligible to receive $360,000 from the state – $20,000 for each year he spent in prison.

Dail, who now lives in Florida, was served Tuesday with a lawsuit by Lorraine Michaels, the mother of his son, who is seeking back child support. The suit does not specify how much money she wants, as is normal in North Carolina, but asks a "reasonable sum for the care and maintenance of the minor child" for the years Dail was in prison.

"Since his release, Mr. Dail has not indicated any intention to provide support to Ms. Michaels," Michaels' attorney, Sarah Heekin, said in a statement. "In order to fully protect my client’s statutory rights, it was necessary to file an action for child support prior to the minor’s eighteenth birthday."

Dail said he was devastated by the suit. He said his son recently moved to Florida to live with him.

"I was thrown in prison. What could I do? I missed my whole life. I missed my son's whole life. I'm not the person to be compensating anyone for anything – not me," Dail said.

"I'm sure the mother had her issues over the years, but nothing like the issues that Dwayne Dail dealt with for 18½ years,” said Chris Mumma, the attorney who helped establish Dail’s innocence.

Heekin, who said she filed the suit last week, works in the same law office as Don Strickland, the former Wayne County assistant district attorney who prosecuted Dail for rape.

Today news is we lost...

Welcome to the info corner...

Have you checked this out?