Child support Search Engine

Child Support search results

Please Donate

“Child Support” is growing and we need the support of our readers. Because we do not advertise on our site, we must ask our loyal readers to continue supporting us and help us grow. We are in need of your donations 5, 10, 15, 25, 50 or 100 will help us reach our budget goal of $300,000 to manage our year end budget. Child Support has managed to touch over 100,000 thousand satisfied reader, and we continue to enjoy the added comments. Thanks for your continued support Kenneth

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Man killed son and baby’s mom to avoid child support

SAN DIEGO – The father of a 10-month-old boy pleaded not guilty Thursday to charges he killed the child and the child's mother in their San Diego apartment in July 2006.

Dennis Potts, 23, of Bonita, faces charges of murder and conspiracy to obstruct justice in what could become a death penalty case. His friend, 23-year-old Max Corn, also of Bonita, pleaded not guilty Thursday to a conspiracy charge.

Both men were arrested Wednesday in connection with the deaths of Tori Vienneau, 22, and her son, Dean Springstube, whose bodies were found July 26, 2006, in their apartment in the Southcrest neighborhood of San Diego. The victims were strangled.

If convicted, Corn faces a maximum sentence of three years in prison.

Prosecutors have not yet decided whether to seek Potts' execution or life without the possibility of parole if he is convicted of murder. Such decisions are usually made after a preliminary hearing, when a judge decides whether there is enough evidence for the case to proceed to trial.


Potts and Corn appeared in San Diego Superior Court Thursday with their respective lawyers, who asked a judge to either set or reduce bail.

Judge David M. Szumowski ordered Potts to remain in custody without bail, noting the two victims in the case and the seriousness of the charges. The judge increased Corn's bail to $500,000 from $200,000.

Deputy District Attorney Per Hellstrom said in court that Potts and Vienneau had a “secret” relationship and she believed he was the father of her son. In spring 2006, she asked Potts to take a paternity test.

Potts agreed to use a mail-in test, but asked Corn to submit the DNA sample, the prosecutor said. When the results showed that Potts was not the baby's father, Vienneau suspected that something was wrong.

“She was concerned that Mr. Potts had faked or tampered with the DNA testing,” Hellstrom told the judge. “She didn't let the issue go.”

Thirteen days later, Vienneau and her son were killed.

Hellstrom said investigators recovered text messages exchanged between Potts and Vienneau the evening of the slaying and recovered Potts' data from a cell-phone tower near her apartment.

Outside the courtroom, Kerry Armstrong – Potts' lawyer – said the relationship between Potts and Vienneau was no secret and that Potts had known about the investigation for the past year and a half.

“He has been adamant from day one that he had nothing to do with these crimes,” Armstrong said.

The prosecutor would not comment on why it took more than a year for investigators to make an arrest.

“In due time, that will come out,” Hellstrom said after the hearing.

Vienneau's mother, Dayna Herroz, said it is satisfying to see Potts and Corn face criminal charges. She said the long wait has been “hell on Earth” for her and her family.

Monday, September 28, 2009

A Good Father - He's Just Unemployed

I just learned one of my young male neighbors, presently unemployed, was recently jailed and is now serving 11/29 for non-payment of child-support. I guess I'm one of the few ones who scratch my head and could never understand the benefits to the child or children and society as a whole for locking someone up for failure to pay child-support, especially if they're not in a position to pay due to job loss. With today's high unemployment rates, for sure there's going to be even more non-custodial parents falling behind in payments.

How does it benefit the child, society, the taxpayer, and even the individual arrested and jailed if he or she can't afford to pay?

Don't think I'm someone who hasn't been there, experienced that. I've been a divorced mom too, struggling to provide for two young children on my own. However, I knew at the time their father was not in a position to pay. Yes, we went without a lot. I missed important medical appointments so my daughter could study classical music from the time she was seven or eight years of age. I learned to make meals on ten dollars or less. Shop at Goodwill. My children wore their cousins' hand-me-downs.

But because of our struggles they learned to appreciate the little things and grew up to be well-rounded individuals. They're not flashy and still prefer to shop at resale shops and are great bargain hunters.

Getting back to my young neighbor - he's a good father who spent lots of time with his daughter, often keeping her for days or even weeks at a time. Now, she won't be seeing her father for another six months or so. Even out of work, he still did small things for her. He just wasn't able to keep up with regular child-support payments.

Who does it help to jail someone for non-payment of child-support or revoke their license? Whoever thought up those two as punishment must have really been asleep at the wheel.

I look at it this way, if the mother applied for or was receiving some kind of public assistance for the child, now you have two or more burdens on the taxpayer. One sitting and wasting away in jail, the child or children still going without. If the individual had some small job, even minimum wage, but still fell behind in payments, that job isn't going to be waiting on him or her six months later when they're released.

Not only that, with a lapse in employment or a prison or jail record, it becomes even more difficult for that person to find a job. And, with a jail or prison record, that individual's offspring can be affected later in life when applying for certain jobs that might require a security clearance, depending upon the level of security.

Then there's the revoked license issue, which just sets the person up for another chance of being arrested if they take a chance and drive without a license, which many will do at some point, creating a revolving door in the criminal justice system. Let's be honest, if the individual can't drive to a job because they've lost their driving privileges, how are they to get to work? Not everyone is lucky enough to have a 9-5 job, and buses don't run on a 24/7 schedule.

The "experts" really need to take time to think about these laws before they sign them into law. In the long term, they serve no one, and only create more problems than solutions. So, now we have another kid who at least had a father who came around and spent time with her, sitting and wasting away in prison for something that should never have been a crime in the first place. There's a difference between the inability VS the ability to pay.

Hopefully, the "experts" will rethink these laws that are really crippling American society and serve no true purpose, except for prison stockholders.

Rick Ross Ordered to Pay Child Support to Ex-Girlfriend

Rick Ross has been actively promoting the upcoming compilation album 'Custom & Cars & Cycles,' with his Triple C's crew, but the Miami rapper's personal issues are currently attracting more attention than his work. After being robbed of $60,000 worth of valuables following a June concert in Tennessee, Ross is now knee-deep in financial and legal disputes with his ex-girlfriend Tia Kemp.

Following months of public mudslinging, a judge ordered the rapper to pay temporary child support to Kemp, who is the mother of his son William Roberts III. Since their breakup, Kemp has openly expressed her discontent with Ross and his lax role as a father figure. Just as recently as last week, she tweeted about her son's birthday and called out Ross for being M.I.A. "Let's see if his lame ass father actually grows enough balls and at least calls to wish his son a happy birthday," Kemp wrote.

After their split, Kemp partnered up with Ross' rival, 50 Cent, appearing in G-Unit videos and releasing a tell-all book about her relationship with Ross, titled 'Tia's Diary: Deeper Than Rap,' under G-Unit Books back in May. And despite the judge's order that Ross must also cover her legal fees, Kemp will appear on two upcoming covers of Smooth magazine with 50 Cent to further publicize her vendetta against Ross. The provocative covers feature a barely dressed Kemp being photographed by 50 Cent, who appears as a guest editor for the issue.

The tension between Ross and Kemp has continued to build, but as part of the judge's child support ruling, Ross was also granted visitation rights to his son.

Jude Law refusing to see newborn baby until DNA tests prove paternity

LONDON - Hollywood film star Jude Law has refused to see a newborn baby, being claimed to be his daughter, until DNA tests prove the paternity of the child.

Model Sam Burke claims that her daughter Sophia, born in Florida on Tuesday, is the product of a fling with the 36-year-old actor.

Jude, however, was not present at the baby’s birth, and even refused to make the three-hour trip from New York, where he’s starring in Hamlet.

“Jude is still very cautious about Sam and Sophia. Until he is 100 per cent certain she is his daughter he is only communicating through lawyers,” the News of the World quoted one of the actor’s pals as saying.

“If he is the father he will meet his obligations to the child. He’s hoping for an early chance to establish that he is genuinely her dad,” the friend added.

Sam is said to have told people closer to her that Jude paid her for antenatal care and for the birth.

However, Jude’s friend said: “It was an act of kindness rather than an admission that he was the dad.”

The paper further reports that Sam’s representatives are negotiating a six-figure deal for pictures of the baby, but Jude’s lawyers have asked her not to talk to the media until they agree a financial package if the baby is confirmed as his.

Sam’s gran Delores accused Jude of taking advantage, saying: “She’s a lovely outgoing girl and he’s a lot older man, with three children from a failed marriage (to Sadie Frost). It breaks your heart.”

I am not surprised that he would not want to have anything to do with the baby before finding out if the child is his. I have found out that the Court system will blast you quickly with sense you established a bond with the child, then you have to maintain that relationship with the child!

Unfortunately the only one that suffers is the guy paying the child support. So men lets be sure, after we know, then we step up!!!

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Child Support, get rich quick!.

Hello,
I am pissed off that the Child Support, allows the Judicial system to take advantage of men period! Hey don't get me wrong I have heard of issues of women paying child support but do they really get the TOUGH Love that men get when they go to court? The reality is no, hell no!




http://www.nobodysmiling.com/hiphop/news/86158.php
At one point in time Child Support was designed to protect the inocent Childern and the mothers. Now it is just a get rich scheme that 60% of the women of the World use to get that added TAX FREE income. I can not begin to imagine that Sean "Pdiddy Combs" pays $35,000 a month for one child. $410,000 thousand dollars a year. That is great for the mother, considering that the income does not even have to be claimed! The person that paid taxes on the income can not even get the benefit of writing it off on his or her taxes.. Now the reality does not haveThe ideal that I make 10 million a year and slept with a star entitles me to lay claim his money? Taking care of the child is one thing helping a mother hit the lottery is something all together different. She starts out with a Lincoln and after she has a baby she drives a Bentely, is that really fair?


http://www.magic-city-news.com/Tony_Zizza/50_Cent_Just_Another_Child_Support_Victim8219.shtml
The ideal of paying child support is great, but what about the people that actually get caught in the system of Child Support in different States? I mean lets keep it real, making a cliam based on gross income is not fair to the man or his childern at home. Why you ask? you make $400 before taxes, after Uncle Sam gets his cut you actually made $320. notion that the dad has to
Ofcourse if married that is a different story I mean Michael Jordan paying
paying On the New York Supreme Court's Appellate Division refused to hear Sean "Diddy" Combs' appeal of a lower-court decision ordering him to pay more than $19,000 a month in child-support payments, according to The Associated Press. In 2005, a judge initially set monthly support payments at $21,782, but later reduced the amount. That was after the Westchester Family Court ruled Diddy should pay $35,000 a month to ex-girlfriend Misa Hylton-Brim for the care of their now-12-year-old son, Justin. ...
Do these women hit the lottery or what?

bobbie brown.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17399817/
How much are the child support payments to this...?
Q. How much does Sean Combs pay Kim Porter in child support?A. An amount between $12,000-$35,000/mo.
The amount Sean "P.Diddy" Combs pays in child support for his two sons has been a hot topic at Answer this... since 2003 when Misa Hylton-Brim, Justin's mom, sued to get her child support payments increased from $5,000/mo. to $35,000/mo. Hylton-Brim's attorney claimed that the increased amount was on par with what Combs paid his other baby mama, Kim Porter, to support her son, Christian. The courts ultimately ordered Combs to pay Hylton-Brim $21,782/mo.
In 2001, Porter sued Combs to get her support increased from the court mandated $11,000/mo. The pair settled out of court and details of the settlement were not disclosed. I have unofficial reason to believe the amount is around $32,000.

The $25,000 per month in child support that 50 Cent pays to his son’s mother is not enough, says the boy’s mother, Shaniqua Tompkins. The rapper is “worth tens and tens of millions of dollars,” said her attorney, Raoul Felder. Tompkins and 50 Cent, born Curtis Jackson, are disputing in family court located in Central Islip, Long Island over their 10-year-old son, Marquise Jackson. With his G-Unit record label, clothing line, ring-tones and other business ventures, 50 Cent made an estimated $33 million in the past year, according to Forbes magazine.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Mother of x-Mayor Herenton’s is seeking a modification in child support

When longtime Memphis Mayor Willie Herenton retired in July, it cost a young boy his health insurance coverage, lawyers for the child's mother said.

A Juvenile Court petition filed Thursday by Claudine Marsh, mother of Michael Herenton, a boy the former mayor fathered out of wedlock in 2004, is asking Herenton to put half of the lump-sum pension he received from the city in a trust fund for the child, who turns 5 today.

Claudine Marsh with her son, Michael, in 2005. He turns 5 today and ''needs health insurance,'' attorneys say.

Claudine Marsh with her son, Michael, in 2005. He turns 5 today and ''needs health insurance,'' attorneys say.

"We don't know what's going to happen in the mayor's future," attorney Patricia A. Woods said. "We don't know what's going to happen in little Michael's future. But we know that the little boy needs health insurance, and he needs it right now."

A Herenton representative said earlier Thursday that the former mayor wouldn't comment until he received the documents.

The complaint comes as Herenton prepares a run for a seat in Congress. The lawyers said Marsh realizes that some might see her legal action as a political ploy.

"There's no good time to do this to a man of his stature," Woods said.

Marsh is now living with her son in Cobb County, Ga., where she has relatives, and she's currently not working, Woods and fellow lawyer William W. Jones IV said.

The lawyers said in court documents that Marsh fears the child will receive none of the $506,845 Herenton got when he retired July 30 without a court order. The boy also relied on his father's health insurance through the city.

They seek an injunction to freeze the pension and an order that Herenton pay $250,000 into a trust fund for the child. They also ask that Herenton be held in contempt of court.

The lawyers said Herenton has been ordered to contribute $2,100 per month for the child, an amount they say is necessary to cover private school and other needs.

The court document filed Thursday says the November 2005 child-support agreement requires Herenton to prove that the child would receive a portion of his city pension. And it alleges that Herenton has understated his income by failing to disclose money from sources such as private real estate transactions and gifts.

The petition also says Herenton is supposed to take care of Michael 80 days per year but has never done so and that Marsh deserves extra compensation because of the former mayor's lack of involvement in the child's life. Woods said Herenton does see the child on occasion, but acts more like a friendly uncle than a concerned parent.

The court action refocuses attention on Herenton's unusual decision to forego a normal pension payout after serving as mayor for more than 17 years. He would have received $75,000 per year, surpassing the lump-sum amount within seven years.

There has been speculation that Herenton left office in midterm at age 69 to protect his pension. A federal grand jury has been investigating the mayor's business practices for months, but it's unclear if criminal prosecution would put the pension in jeopardy.

The story of Herenton's out-of-wedlock child came to light in 2005. He spoke about it at a press conference a day after The Commercial Appeal talked to Marsh, who was 31 and working as a security guard at the time she met Herenton, who was 64. The relationship ended after a few months.

Herenton, who is divorced and has three adult children, had already faced scrutiny for affairs with a principal and a teacher while he was Memphis City Schools superintendent years earlier.


I am pissed that Ms Marsh has the nerve to want more money. She gets $2,000 a month and still is not satisfied. She has the nerve to say that she wants half of his retirement money, what??? I ain't saying she is a gold digger but she is not messing with no broke guys. This is unbelievable, if they give her another penny more they are contributing to the obscenity of the games some women play... Stop the madness, and start cutting back on the amount of money that the women are getting and allot of these issues will stop yesterday.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Survey says" You are not the father!


ATLaNTA, Sept. 23 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- In 2003, The American Association of Blood Banks found that in almost 30 percent of the paternity tests conducted the man being tested is not the biological father.

"This means millions of fathers may unknowingly be raising children who are not theirs biologically. When a man discovers the truth about the child's parentage, this can have a far-reaching emotional impact upon him, the child, and the families involved like John Edwards' situation," said Carnell Smith PfV, renowned paternity fraud expert and director of U.S. Citizens Against Paternity Fraud (http://www.PaternityFraud.com ).

Smith said, "Surprisingly there has been no formal study of this - until now."

Sharon Squires, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Sociology at California State University-Dominguez Hills, and Carnell Smith PfV have joined forces to develop a new on-line survey, the first of its kind, which will examine the emotional, financial, legal, and social impact of paternity fraud on men.

"We know very little formally about how men react to learning that they are not the biological father of a child they thought they had fathered," said Dr. Squires. "Men have few places to turn for help when they find themselves in this situation. With this survey we want to get a baseline understanding of this very important issue which has profound implications for society and for a child's right to know their identity."

Frank Hatley is a paternity fraud victim, recently released from jail after serving about one year for owing back child support reimbursement for a child proven by DNA testing not to be his. Hatley is childless, according to a CNN report (8/11/09).http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/08/11/georgia.child.support/index.html

Hatley's release was based upon use of the 2002 Georgia paternity fraud law. Carnell Smith was the driving force behind this law.

Dr. Squires and Carnell Smith will join filmmaker Angelo Lobo for a special question and answer period after the showing of Lobo's documentary, "Support? System Down", http://www.SupportTheMovie.com ) showing in Atlanta, Georgia at the Peachtree Village International Film Festival at the Underground Atlanta Event Loft on September, 26, 2009, at 4 PM EST. "Mistakes and questionable practices of child support agencies are much more common than many people think," said Lobo.

This is starting to be a common thing,

You can run but you can not hide

You can run from child support,


but you can not hide!

A MAN who changed his name to avoid paying child support has been fined £700 at Salisbury Magistrates’ Court.

Roebyn Tusk, 56, of Donhead St Andrew, was found guilty in his absence on Monday for failing to supply information to the Child Support Agency (CSA).

The CSA made several attempts to contact Tusk, who had changed his name from Robert Kerr to avoid paying child support for his three children.

The court heard from Wendy Mark, a compliance inspector who said Tusk has been evasive and denied having ever changed his name or having any children.

She contacted the DVLA, who confirmed that a man at the address they had for him had applied for a change of name on his driving licence from Robert Kerr to Roebyn Tusk.

She also obtained a copy of his marriage licence to his second wife, which showed his name as Roebyn Tusk but had his father as Kerr.

The magistrates found him guilty of failing to supply information to the CSA and ordered him to pay a fine of £700 and £515 costs.

Killing to avoid paying child support

MARIANNA — Prosecutors said Wednesday that child support was Wesley Williams’ motive in a 2005 quadruple murder, but the defense called the state’s argument “somewhat suspect.”

Williams, 25, is accused of killing Danielle Baker, 19, and three of her four children, Amad, 3, Amarion, 1, and Aaron, 3 weeks. Baker was shot to death inside her Cottondale Village apartment on March 17, 2005. The three boys suffocated after being bound with duct tape.

Williams, who fathered two of the boys, is charged with four counts of first-degree murder and three counts of aggravated child abuse. He faces the death penalty if convicted as charged.

Testimony in the trial began Wednesday afternoon and continues today.

Prosecutor Larry Basford told jurors in his opening statement that Williams killed Baker and the children because he didn’t want to pay child support.

“He was angry at Danielle because she was messing in his business, and he didn’t want to have to pay child support,” Basford said.

He said to understand what happened the morning of March 17, 2005, jurors would have to look weeks and months before that date. Basford said Baker discovered that Williams, with whom she was having an on-again-off-again relationship, had impregnated another woman even though he was living with a girlfriend in Sneads. Basford said Williams got angry at Baker for calling his girlfriends and “stirring things up.”

“They have a heated conversation, and he threatens to whip her ass for messing in his business,” Basford said.

At the same time, he said, Baker had taken steps through the courts to get Williams to start paying $676 a month in child support.

Basford said the morning the killings were discovered, Sheriff Lou Roberts broke the news to Williams that his two sons had been killed. Basford said Williams turned away, put his face toward a wall and said, “No, no, no. He then composed himself and came back.”

Roberts “was surprised and amazed at the lack of emotion displayed by the defendant upon hearing that his two oldest sons have been killed,” Basford said.

Williams had been driving around the night of the killings with a friend, Donald Allen. The two had gone from Chattahoochee to Liberty County, where they spent some time with two girlfriends. When they left around 1 a.m., Williams’ cell phone records showed he called Baker nine times, many of them only a few seconds long as phone service cut off.

Basford said the last call was about 2:30 a.m., and it was recorded as coming through the cell tower at Marianna, which would put Williams in the area around the time of the killings. Williams denies being in Marianna at that time, and his girlfriend in Sneads said he was home with her before 3 a.m.

Allen originally told investigators that he did not see anything unusual in Williams’ behavior or his dealings with Baker that night. Basford said that a year later, Allen was arrested on a probation violation and told investigators then that Williams had confessed to him that he killed Baker because she tried to get his income tax refund.

Allen said he saw Williams with a gun at Williams’ apartment in Sneads. Basford said officers searched the yard and found a .38-caliber bullet, the same caliber used to kill Baker. The bullets could not be positively matched as coming from the same gun.

The last piece of evidence investigators found was a small limb hair on the duct tape used to bind one of the children; it was matched to Williams through mitochondrial DNA.



Defense

Deputy Public Defender Walter Smith said that same DNA would match 13 of every 1,000 blacks and all of Williams’ relatives on his mother’s side of the family. He said there also is no way of saying how that hair got on the tape, since Williams had been at the apartment a few weeks before.

Smith refuted Basford’s theories of Williams’ motives for the killings. He said both Williams and Baker had multiple sexual partners who they were both aware of. Smith said Baker talked to Williams’ current girlfriend an hour before she was killed, and it was common for them to converse.

“You’re not going to hear anything about Wesley Williams being one of those possessive, controlling types,” Smith said.

He said Baker was not seeking child support. She was on welfare, which was a far more consistent form of payment than the irregular child support payments she could expect from a person making minimum wage at a grocery story. Smith said at the time of the killings nothing had been filed seeking child support from Williams.

“That motive for the crime is somewhat suspect and it doesn’t really hold up,” Smith said.

In addition, he said, even if Williams was mad at Baker over the child support issue, it didn’t make any sense for him to kill the children, especially someone else’s child. Smith said if Baker died, the children and the welfare checks on their behalf would go to Williams.

He said the only reason Williams was charged was because Allen, in an effort to keep himself out of jail for the probation violation, lied to investigators about Williams killing Baker. Smith said it worked because even now, years after his arrest and a failed escape attempt with which he also is charged, Allen remains free.

Smith said the evidence in this case, including DNA, points to two other unidentified people committing this crime. He said the time of the killing can be ascertained by two people living next door to Baker at the time, who heard voices, water running and possibly a gunshot between 2:45 and 3:15 a.m.

“They heard Danielle Baker say, ‘Why are you doing this to us?’” Smith said.

He said the tape that was applied to the three children obviously was done by two different people; one did a meticulous job and the other was sloppy. Smith said no one knows why Baker’s daughter was spared. He said she was asleep under a bed at the time and the killers might not have known she was there.

“I expect that what you’re going to hear is that Wesley Williams is not an upstanding guy,” Smith said. “He’s not the most responsible guy in the world, but he’s certainly not a cold-blooded killer. I think what you’re going to get from the evidence is it’s not going to make a lot of sense and there’s certainly going to be reasonable doubt about Wesley Williams’ involvement in the homicides.”

Monday, September 21, 2009

Unemployment creates a problem with child support payments

The number of non-custodial parents receiving unemployment benefits is much higher than last fall with human services officials expecting numbers to rise again this winter.

There were 12 non-custodial parents out of 853 child support cases receiving unemployment benefits in September 2008. Eleven months later in August that number rose to 54 out of 846 child support cases.

The numbers peaked in March when 78 non-custodial parents out of 871 child support cases received unemployment benefits.

Wadena County Human Services Director Paul Sailer explained the significance of the numbers.

“We started to track this because we were curious how this might affect child support payments,” he told commissioners at Tuesday’s social services board meeting.

For example, a father with a job who was making $400 payments in child support a month can go to court and have that amount reduced if he loses his job and is on unemployment, Sailer said. That, in turn, affects the mother, who may then qualify for public assistance programs.

Sailer was not hopeful the numbers would improve in coming months.

“I think these numbers are going to bounce back right about to where they were last winter,” he said.

Amie Spartz, collections and accounting supervisor, said in a subsequent e-mail interview she cannot give a specific amount for the impact the unemployment rate has on child support payments. She does believe that the unemployment rate has affected the drop in collections recorded in the county.

In October through December 2008, social services disbursed $532,402 in child support payments, according to Spartz. There was an average of 32 obligors on unemployment during that time. In January through March the disbursement was down to $517,841 with an average of 72 obligors receiving unemployment. In April though June social services disbursed $605,790 with an average of 62 obligors receiving unemployment benefits.

Spartz believed the April through June payments were higher because that is a peak time for intercepting federal and state income tax refunds, she said.

Tags: news, business, government

Policer arrested for not making child support payments

A Bosque Farms Police Officer has been arrested on a warrant for past-due child support, making him the second officer from the department arrested in as many weeks.

Bosque Farms Police Chief Joe Stidham said Officer John Valdez was arrested on a warrant for past due child support, and taken into custody in Albuquerque.

"He is on leave at this time," Stidham said.

He said the department is waiting to hear back from the village attorney on the case, and Valdez will remain on leave until they decide what the proper course of action is.

Stidham said no determination has been made on whether Valdez will be terminated from the department.

Valdez was stabbed earlier this summer as he was jogging on a Peralta ditchbank by an unknown assailant.

Another Bosque Farms Police officer also remained on leave Tuesday after an arrest last week. Paul Gomez was arrested earlier this month in Los Lunas and subsequently charged with DWI.

A criminal complaint filed in Los Lunas Magistrate Court states that a witness saw Gomez swerving across traffic lanes in the moments prior to the accident and that after Gomez exited his vehicle he "was shaking and acting weird."

The criminal complaint states witnesses said Gomez attempted to drive away from the crash but was stopped by bystanders, who placed themselves around his vehicle.

Gomez, a former Bernalillo County sheriff's deputy and former Los Lunas police officer, was also pulled over Sept. 22, 2008, after police received a call about a sheriff's department car driving erratically, Los Lunas police spokesman Charles Nuanes said.

Gomez was pulled over, but was not cited or charged, and his supervisors from the Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department came to Los Lunas to pick him up and have him drug-tested, said Bernalillo County Undersheriff Sam Baragiola said.

Stidham said Gomez was also on leave paid administrative leave.

Man shot trying to collect child support

HARALSON COUNTY, Ga. -- Authorities said a shooting stemming from dispute in Haralson County has left one man dead and another critically injured.

Deputy Jim Beck said the shooting happened when Denise Watkins stopped by her ex-husband's Buchanan home to pick up a child support payment.

When Watkins and her current husband arrived, 33-year-old Shane Brown was the only person home.

Beck said it appears Brown shot 33-year-old Tony Watkins, who died at the scene. Police say they don't know why Brown had a gun.

Beck said a deputy heard additional shots as he arrived at the scene. Police believe Brown shot himself in the jaw. Brown was flown to Grady Memorial Hospital where he was in surgery late Friday.

Denise Watkins was treated at a local hospital for minor injuries and released.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Man convicted of drowning son over paying child support


FULLERTON, Calif.—An Orange County father has been convicted of murdering his 4-year-old son by drowning him in a bathtub.

The Superior Court panel returned its decision Tuesday and will consider on Wednesday whether Gideon Omondi was insane at the time of the 2006 killing.

His defense attorney says Omondi was distraught about a custody fight and didn't know what he did was wrong.

He was also convicted Tuesday of trying to kill his son earlier by putting him in the trunk of his car and dousing it with gasoline.

Omondi pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. If jurors find Omondi is insane, he will be sent to a state mental hospital. Otherwise he faces a minimum of 25 years to life in prison.

Ex-NFL player pleads guilty in child support case


Former NFL linebacker Dwayne Rudd has pleaded guilty to failure to pay more than $540,000 in child support.

The U.S. attorney in Nashville announced Wednesday that Rudd, who played for Minnesota, Cleveland and Tampa Bay during his seven-season career, pleaded guilty in federal court last week and faces up to two years in prison.



Court records shows that Rudd, who is 31 and lives in Atlanta, owes child support for his 11-year-old daughter, who currently lives with her mother in Tennessee.

Drafted by the Vikings in 1997, Rudd may be best known for costing the Browns a win against Kansas City in 2002. With the Browns leading, Rudd sacked the quarterback in the closing seconds and celebrated by tossing his helmet. The referees called a penalty, which set up the Chief's game-winning field goal with no time on the clock.

According to court records, Rudd's yearly income while in the NFL was about $5 million and since retiring he has been receiving annuity payments of about $11,000 a month, as well as income from investment sources and real estate income.

Rudd and Stacie Wade had a child in 1998, but never married. He was ordered by an Illinois state court to pay $7,500 per month in child support, but prosecutors say he consistently failed to pay.

"This is another sad example of a parent, who has the means to pay child support, failing to meet his court-ordered responsibilities," said U.S. Attorney Ed Yarbrough.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

More Parents Requesting Child Support Modifications in Down Economy


As parents across the country find themselves unable to meet their existing support obligations in the current economic climate, courts have faced a rush of child support modification requests. With national unemployment rates hovering around 10 percent, more people are being forced to take unpaid time off, having their hours cut or losing their jobs altogether.

With finances growing increasingly tight, some parents are finding it impossible to care for their children on the amount of support they receive each month. Other parents are finding it equally difficult to keep up with their support obligations on decreased or non-existent incomes. Applying for a child support modification is one way parents may be able to alleviate some of their financial stresses.

Do Not Stop Making Child Support Payments

Unilaterally decreasing the amount of child support paid each month or stopping payment altogether is one of the biggest mistakes parents who are required to pay child support can make.

Under Virginia law, the only way to legally change the amount of child support owed each month is by court order. Even if the parents reach an agreement together to change the amount of support, this agreement is not legally enforceable until a court has approved it.

Parents who stop paying support or pay less than they owe will begin accruing arrears and may be subject to other significant penalties, including wage garnishment, property liens, driver's license suspension, fines or even jail time. Unpaid child support payments do not go away and cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.

Only a Court Can Change a Support Order

Parents who are unable to make their monthly support payments must submit a petition to the court for a modification of the child support order. Either parent can request the modification. The court may decide to increase the amount of support, decrease the amount or leave the amount unchanged.

In Virginia, a court will only grant a request for a modification if there has been a substantial change in circumstances in the parent's or child's condition since the current support order was entered.

Examples of substantial changes in circumstances include:
-New employment
-Job loss or reduced income
-Marriage or divorce of one of the parents
-Serious medical condition of a child or parent
-Birth of a new child

The parent requesting the child support modification has the burden of proving that there has been a substantial change in circumstances. If the parent is seeking a reduction in the amount of support he or she must pay, the parent also must fully disclose his or her financial situation to prove inability to pay. Additionally, the parent has the burden of showing that the inability to pay is not caused by a voluntary or negligent act.

Unemployment/Underemployment

In Virginia, the court has the power to impute income to a parent if the parent is underemployed or voluntarily unemployed. This means that the court can use a parent's former income rather than the current income to calculate support payments in certain situations. For example, if a parent voluntarily leaves a well-paying job without having a new job, the court may use the salary from the former position to determine the appropriate child support payment.

In the current economy though, many parents are losing well-paying jobs and being forced to take lower paying positions or even part-time work to keep a steady paycheck. Depending on the parent's profession or work experience, it can take six months or longer to find a new job, making it difficult for many to find comparable employment and income. Under state law, the court could consider this underemployment.

Before deciding whether to grant a modification, the court will consider all of the relevant factors and examine the impact of the modification on the child. Some judges are more understanding of the economy's impact on a parent's ability to find comparable employment and may be less inclined to impute income. However, this is not always the case.

How a Family Law Attorney Can Help

Before you submit a petition to modify a child support order, it is important you speak with an experienced family law attorney. The modification process can be frustrating for someone not familiar with the legal system or the specific requirements for making the request.

An attorney can review your family's specific circumstances and develop the best possible strategy for presenting your modification request. In some cases, the attorney may be able to negotiate a settlement with the other parent to modify the support amount without litigating the matter in court. While the agreement still will have to be approved by the court, a negotiated settlement will decrease the amount of time you will have to spend in front of a judge.

For more information on child support modifications, speak with an experienced family law attorney.

African Billionaire's Family Surviving on U.S. Welfare

Gabonese Democratic Party candidate Ali-Ben Bongo Ondimba may have some explaining to do abroad -- and here in the United States.

While the presidential hopeful is focused on winning the Gabonese election -- he is among 3 candidates claiming victory in the Aug. 30 contest -- his estranged wife, Inge Bongo (nee Inge Collins), and their adopted children subsist on welfare in the United States.

The beautiful California native (pictured left leaving the welfare office in Riverside) told Black Voices that she still loves her husband.


Who's Zooming Who?

Bongo (pictured right in June) is the son of the late Omar Bongo, who served as president of Gabon from 1967-2009.

In 2007, Inge Bongo was seen on VH1's 'Really Rich Real Estate' shopping for a $25 million mansion in Malibu for herself and her husband. This raised a few eyebrows considering that the average Gabonese person made the equivalent of $6,670 that year.

Now, she says she has gone from high roller to living off government assistance. Yet, her husband and his second wife, Sylvia Valentin, don't seem to mind.

U.S. taxpayers, however, should, because they are footing the bill.

For the Love of Money

Bongo and Valentin are under investigation in France for corruption, and so far, $900 million in assets has been seized from the couple. Ironically, Bongo has vowed to "redistribute the proceeds of economic growth and fight corruption and fraud."

It appears that the son may have more in common with the father other than DNA. The late Omar Bongo was also under investigation for corruption.

According to BBC, in 2003, Omar Bongo was named in one of the biggest corporate trials in France involving the oil firm Elf. Allegedly, he pocketed $16.7 million from Elf in exchange for preferential treatment over U.S. and British oil firms. As a result of the trial, many former Elf executives were jailed.

Omar Bongo's name once again popped up during a 2005 investigation into fundraising appropriation on the part of lobbyist Jack Abramoff. A U.S. Senate Committee investigation revealed that Abramoff requested $9 million to arrange a meeting between Bongo and President George W. Bush. 10 months after the request, Omar Bongo and George W. Bush met in the White House's Oval Office. According to The New York Times, there has "been no evidence in the public record that Mr. Abramoff had any role in organizing the meeting or that he received any money or had a signed contract with Gabon."

Records show that the family's financial history is sketchy at the very least. At the time of Omar Bongo's death in June, the family owned more real estate in France than anyone. Meanwhile, the average Gabonese person would be lucky to own one piece of real estate.

Hood Rich, Cash Poor

Located south of Cameroon, Gabon was once a wealthy African nation due to the oil boom in the 1980s and the country's relatively low population (nearly 1.5 million people). But like many African nations, it succumbed to the temptation of foreign loans from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Nowadays, Gabon has joined a long list of African nations experiencing foreign exploitation because of financial misappropriation and dependency on foreign aid.

On paper, Gabon may be one of the wealthiest African nations, based on its GDP, but the country imports most of its products and suffers from high inflation rates.

Politricks

While the current election has been propped up as a democratic process, several thousand Gabonese protesters don't see it that way. According to the Agence France-Presse, earlier this month, thousands of demonstrators rallied against Bongo, calling for his resignation as defense minister. One demonstrator who declined to be identified, said, "We supported the father, but we don't want the son. If people don't listen to us, everything will burn."

If Bongo steals this year's presidential election, as many believe he will, he certainly will not be the first African leader to steer an election in his favor. Quieting dissent through violence, payoffs to the opposition and other sneaky-handed tactics have been used in other African countries to secure election victories.

First Wife's Tale

While Bongo is living lavish in an $800 million presidential palace, Inge and their kids (ages 22 and 10) are living like paupers.

The Los Angeles-born Mrs. Bongo is, admittedly, not a saint, but she is legally married to her husband both in the United States and in Gabon. And here in the United States, polygamy is a crime.

When Black Voices caught up with the 45-year-old former interior designer said that she did not want U.S. taxpayers to have to support her and her children, and that she simply wanted her husband to man up.

"I'm trying to feed my children," she humbly stated. "I love him. And I still support him," she said, fighting back tears. "I'm going to vote for him. For the sake of the Gabonese people, he needs to win the election. I don't want to see Gabon become another Ivory Coast."

Inge said she believes her husband will make sure he wins the election at any cost.

When they met, Inge says, she was young and naïve. The couple had their first date in 1988 and were married in 1994. At that time, she says, she was happy and had little idea what her life as the wife of an African dictator would be like.

She didn't expect for her husband to have countless mistresses, and she certainly didn't think that she would be physically assaulted (Bongo allegedly physically and emotionally abused her for years). She revealed that she almost lost her life on a number of occasions.

If Bongo wins the election, she will be the first American first lady of an African nation.

And Inge Bongo is on welfare.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Lil Wayne: Lauren London & Nivea Expecting Sons?!


Rumor has it, Lil Wayne has two babies on the way, so if true, he’ll be a father of four. Actress Lauren London is reportedly six months pregnant with Wayne’s son and Weezy’s fiance Nivea, is rumored to be having a boy as well. So, who will deliver first? Hopefully their due dates are far enough apart that Wayne won’t have to try to be in two places at once. Awkward! I guess they could share a hospital room, you know, to make things less complicated.

T-Pain Sued For Child Support


A loyal reader who works in the same midtown building as rapper T-Pain’s lawyer emailed Sandrarose.com over the weekend to say she saw T-Pain, real name Faheem Rasheed Najm, leaving his attorney’s office on Friday (8/28).

Word gets around quickly, and she learned that T-Pain was there to attend a mediation meeting to resolve child support issues with his baby mama, Elisa Hood, aka Ms. Cherry from VH1’s Miss Rap Supreme.

Let’s just say that the mediation didn’t turn out as well as all parties had hoped.

For a rapper who just put out a track titled “I Support baby Mamas” he certainly isn’t supporting his own very well.

Before Friday, Ms. Hood was barely making ends meet with a measly $2,000 a month from the same rapper who bragged about dropping over $400,000 on a “big ass chain” inlaid with 197kt. diamonds. When T-Pain posted the pics of his 10 lb. chain on twitter last month, we chose not to participate in the nignorance by reposting the pics.

According to court documents, this dead beat dad pulls down $15 million a year in records sales, royalties and appearance fees. He owns an impressive collection of almost 40 luxury vehicles, including a Lambo, Bentley and a Phantom. Yet the cheapskate and his attorney put an offer on the table for a mere $500 per month more than the $2,000 he is already paying Ms. Hood in support for their 2-year-old son King!

Don’t you hate so-called ballers who value money and material possessions over their own seed? Oh, did I forget to mention that T-Pain was already married with children at home when he laid up with Ms. Hood?



Woman charged with sex with minor

WEST POINT — A 37-year-old Syracuse woman was arrested Sunday for allegedly having a sexual relationship with a teenage girl.

Kerrie Lynn Ferguson faces four counts of unlawful sexual contact with a minor, all third-degree felonies, according to charges filed Monday in 2nd District Court.

A Davis County Sheriff's deputy spotted the woman and a 15-year-old girl in a parked car Sunday afternoon at Bingham Park, near 4550 West and 550 North. As the officer approached the vehicle, he found the two "in the act," Davis County Sheriff's Capt. Kenny Payne said.

The deputy placed Ferguson under arrest and released the girl to her parents. Payne said police believe the girl is a friend of Ferguson's daughter.

Officers booked Ferguson into Davis County Jail Sunday for investigation of several first-degree felony charges because police believed Ferguson was a person who had a relationship of special trust with the victim, said Steve Major, deputy Davis County Attorney. "But (we) couldn't show she (the girl) was under a type of special trust."

Utah law states a juvenile is not old enough to "consent" to sex until he or she is 16 years old, Major said. And even then, so-called consensual sex by minors is only defensible if the older party is less than 10 years older than the minor.

"The idea is we don't want 42-year-old men having sex with 16-year-old girls..." Major said. "It's less predatory if you're 18 and your girlfriend is 16."

It wasn't immediately clear if Ferguson would face an enhanced felony charge for being 22 years older.

She posted a $50,000 bail prior to her initial hearing in court Monday, which she did not attend.

Ohio man sentenced to 6 months for failing to pay $15,000 dollars in child support


AKRON — John Lee Bishop Jr., 50, of Akron, was sentenced last week to six months in prison for failing to pay $15,100 in child support.

He pleaded to criminal non-support Aug. 28 and was sentenced by Summit County Common Pleas Judge Thomas Teodosio.

Bishop owes support for one child. He was ordered to pay $132.80 a month in 2000.

He pleaded guilty to that offense and was placed on community control for five years. After violating the conditions of his probation, he was sentenced to the Oriana House Work Release Program.

Monday, August 31, 2009

Couple accused of passing $27,000 in fake money orders to pay for child support

Two Baltic residents who reportedly paid nearly $27,000 in child support with phony money orders were indicted for forgery Thursday.

Brian William Denson, 49, was being held at the Minnehaha County Jail last month for nonpayment of child support. At Denson's request, his 29-year-old girlfriend, Jamie Ann Moore, reportedly brought 27 counterfeit money orders to the Department of Social Services office in Sioux Falls to pay off Denson's bill, according to court documents.

Later that day, she used two other counterfeit money orders to pay the child support of Denson's friend Jonathan DeBelts, who also was being held for nonpayment of child support.

Sioux Falls Police got a call about the forgeries from the Department of Social Services in Pierre on July 7, police spokesman Sam Clemens said.

"That's pretty rare," he said. "We do run into the fake money orders, but it's usually some kind of scam."

The Department of Social Services declined to comment on the ongoing investigation, but spokeswoman Tarah Jahnig did say that this was the only case of child support fraud in recent memory involving forged money orders.

"It's usually just bad checks," she said.

After the Pierre office told police about the money orders, Moore was put in a lineup for two Sioux Falls DSS employees. They identified Moore as the person who brought in the forged money orders, and police obtained a search warrant for the couple's Baltic home.

That search turned up computers, printers, scanners and seven other $950 counterfeit money orders.

Denson told police that he wasn't aware the money orders were fake until after he was released from jail.

Moore was charged with 10 counts of forgery and Denson was charged with 10 counts of aiding and abetting forgery.

They each face up to five years in prison on each count.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Penn Hills man who owes nearly $70,000 was arrested on bench warrants


A Penn Hills man who owes nearly $70,000 in child support was arrested Saturday morning, the Allegheny County Sheriff's office said.

Keith Douthett, 49, was among the sheriff's "most wanted" child support offenders and was wanted on three bench warrants issued in April 2006, according to the sheriff's office.

Douthett was apprehended about 8:50 a.m. in the 100 block of South Avenue in Wilkinsburg, the sheriff's office said. Detectives began putting the area under surveillance after receiving an anonymous tip several days ago.

Douthett is being held in the Allegheny County Jail.

Monday, August 24, 2009

Wronged 'deadbeat dad' may be free of child support

hen Frank Hatley walked out of a South Georgia jail last week, the state said he still owed more than $10,000 in past-due child support for a son who wasn’t his.

But now, state attorneys are asking a Cook County judge to relieve Hatley of all his child support obligations.

“I appreciate that because it’s the right thing,” Hatley, the “deadbeat dad” who had no children, said Thursday. “When I get all my rights back, that’ll be the peace of God.”

In a recent interview, Dena Smith, spokeswoman for the state Department of Human Resources, said her agency will propose legislation in next year’s General Assembly to make sure what happened to Hatley will not happen again to anyone facing the same predicament.

Hatley, 50, sat in a South Georgia jail in Adel for almost 13 months even though a special assistant state attorney general and the judge knew he was not the child’s biological father. In 2001, Hatley had been ordered to pay $16,398 in past-due child support even though a DNA test proved he was not the parent.

Hatley paid off about $6,000 of that over the ensuing years but fell behind again after he lost his job and was living in his car. Still, Hatley used some of his unemployment benefits to make partial payments.

But in June 2008, Cook County Superior Court Judge Dane Perkins found Hatley in contempt and ordered him jailed. Hatley sat there until a lawyer, Sarah Geraghty of the Southern Center for Human Rights in Atlanta, filed a court motion asking for Hatley’s release. Perkins freed Hatley on July 15 after finding he was indigent and unable to make the necessary payments to obtain his release.

But Perkins postponed considering Geraghty’s request that Hatley be relieved of the $10,263 the state said he still owed.

Hatley got in such a fix because of a relationship he had in the late 1980s with Essie Lee Morrison. In 1987, Morrison gave birth to a son, Travon, and told Hatley the child was his. Two years later, Morrison applied for public assistance for Travon and the state then moved to get Hatley to reimburse it for the cost of Travon’s support.

Since then, Hatley paid more than $9,500, court records say. But in 2000, Hatley and Travon gave DNA samples to an independent testing lab, which found the two were not related. In 2001, Perkins relieved Hatley of future child support but ordered him to still pay his past-due obligations.

In a motion filed Wednesday, the state Attorney General’s Office said the Office of Child Support Services (OCSS) had determined Hatley still owed $5,556 to the state for unreimbursed welfare payments and $4,706 in child support to Travon’s non-parent custodian, Beatrice Morrison, who is now deceased.

Hatley should be relieved of his reimbursement obligations because of his “apparent indigence and that repayment of this debt would result in substantial and unreasonable hardship,” the state said. As for the $4,706 in past-due child support, OCSS has been informed that Travon, now 21, does not object to waiving those arrears, the motion said.

As a result, the state said it “would have no objection to an order waiving all arrears and directing it to close its enforcement case,” the state’s filing said.

Hatley, who is now living with a relative, said he hopes Perkins agrees to the state’s motion.

“It would be great news,” he said. “It would mean that finally I can get a job and not have to worry about them taking some of what little I make for a son who wasn’t none of mine.”

Scott Storch behind on Child Support Over 40K


Multi-platinum producer Scott Storch is wanted by the Miami-Dade County police after missing a court appearance, the Miami Herald reports today.

Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Marc Schumacher issued a warrant for Storch’s arrest after he failed to appear at the latest hearing in an ongoing child support battle with the mother of his two-year-old son Jalen.

The boy’s mother, Dalene Jennifer Daniel, originally filed a complaint in 2006 stating that Storch owed $46,000 in back child support.

The balance represents $30,000 in monthly payments and $16,000 in contributions to Jalen’s Florida Prepaid College Plan, as set forth in a mediated settlement agreement between Storch and Daniel.

Once in custody, Storch would have to pay the full balance in order to be released on bond.

Otherwise the warrant authorizes police to keep him in jail until his next court appearance.

KELIS WANTS MORE SPOUSAL/CHILD SUPPORT: Her lawyer is seeking "retroactive" money from rapper.


*Additional spousal support is being requested by singer Kelis in her ongoing divorce court drama with estranged husband Nas.

According to TMZ.com, sources say Kelis' lawyers have drawn up a list of items that she should be awarded, including back child and spousal support.

Her lawyer Laura Wasser filed documents requesting that the rap star pay $281,571 in retroactive spousal support and $29,522 in retroactive child support. And because Nas makes over $244,000 per month, Wasser believes Kelis is entitled to $72,728 in spousal support and in the future, $17,225 a month in child support.

A judge is expected to rule on the additional requests at the next scheduled hearing in September.

Kelis was awarded $44,000 worth of child and spousal support on July 23, shortly after giving birth to their son Knight.

What planet is this woman on? Don't get me wrong maybe NAS is balling like that, but realistically speaking when is enough enough? 1 million dollars a year is crazy... I understand why pre nup is a common language you must use as a superstar... It is the mans duty to take care of his x-wife and child but any time it takes you to the poor house to provide her income is out of the question! If she can not survive on $40, 000 a month she should not get a dime.

Child support payments cut as parents lose jobs

Child support payments cut as parents lose jobs

THOUSANDS of parents receiving child support from their former partners face lower payments as more lose their jobs.

Welfare groups are concerned the number of parents paying the minimum payment of $12 a fortnight will increase as unemployment rises.

"The human tragedy is that two families could be placed under extra financial stress - not just the family that they are living with, but the family they are assisting through their child support payments," the president of the National Welfare Rights Network, Kate Beaumont, said.

The loss of a job could mean the parent receiving child support gets only $6 a child per week instead of the average of $77 a week. Some of the difference could be made up through increased family tax payments.

Increasing unemployment is likely to make it harder for the Federal Government to ensure parents are receiving adequate money to raise their families.

It is already grappling with a debt in unpaid child support that grew by about 5 per cent to $1 billion last financial year.

This was despite increasingly tough measures used by the Government to recover the money, such as hiring private detectives to spy on people suspected of under-reporting their income and automatically deducting payments from welfare benefits.

The Minister for Human Services, Joe Ludwig, said the Child Support Agency was paying close attention to the effect of rising unemployment on child support payments.

"Many Australians, through no fault of their own, have lost their jobs, had their hours cut back or had their pay reduced as a direct result of the global recession. This can make it especially hard for separated parents to pay child support for the benefit of their children," Senator Ludwig said.

The agency was granted an extra $223 million in last week's budget to offer financial counselling to separated parents whose payments have been affected by changing work circumstances.

Michel’le Demands Child Support From Suge Knight


Michel’le Demands Child Support From Suge Knight
Singer Michel’le has filed child support charges against her Ex-husband Marion Suge Knight, reports the Wall Street Journal. Michel’le is asking for $40,476 in three-months of unpaid court-ordered spousal and child support. In addition to the $40,476, she is asking that she receive $13,492 in child support each month for her son Balei, whom she had with the former head of Death Row records seven years ago. In 1997, Toussaint “agreed to marry Knight while he was serving a prison sentence for assault and battery.” Soon after Bailei’s birth in 2002, her relationship with Suge Knight ended.

In the coming months, Michel’le will be heading to bankruptcy court since Suge is believed to be bankrupt; Suge filed for bankruptcy three years ago.

Michel’le also has another son named Marcel, with whom she had with rapper/producer Dr. Dre.

Friday, August 21, 2009

Warrant Issued For Bobby Brown For Missed Child Support

An arrest warrant was been issued for Bobby Brown this week, after he failed to appear in a Massachusetts court on a contempt complaint.

According to the Associated Press, Judge Christina Harms ordered Brown be arrested the next time he sets foot in Massachusetts for missing a hearing in June regarding child support.

The 40-year-old singer has reportedly fallen behind on payments to the tune of $45,000, for the two teenage children he has with former girlfriend Kim Ward.

He's supposed to pay $5,500 a month.

At press time, he had not commented on the news.

This isn't the first time Brown had been in trouble for failed child support payments. In 2007, he served four days in jail.

Ex-NFL player facing child support charges

CINCINNATI, Aug. 20 (UPI) -- Former NFL defensive end Roosevelt Theodore Nix was arrested in Hamilton County, Ohio, for not paying $214,245 in child support, authorities allege.

The Cincinnati Enquirer reported Thursday that Nix, 42, was arrested on a Hamilton County Juvenile Court warrant for an alleged lack of child support payments for his 16-year-old son, whose identity was not reported.

Nix, who reportedly also missed a 2006 child support hearing, is accused of not making any child support payments for the teen since 2000.

In addition to facing charges for the missing child support payments, Nix was charged with escape and contempt of court for his absence at the 2006 hearing.

After being drafted by the Cincinnati Bengals in the eighth round of the 1992 NFL draft, Nix went on to play in 16 games for the Bengals. He later played two games with the Minnesota Vikings, amassing a career total of six tackles.

Today news is we lost...

Welcome to the info corner...

Have you checked this out?